![]() So there is no general answer to the question, what is the domain of the social there is no systematic and final definition of the social world. ![]() Rather, these social concepts or constructs are theorized and developed in a complicated back-and-forth by sociologists or political scientists seeking to identify social-level constructs that seem to give some insight into the ordinary and systematic experiences we have of the social world. These social factors aren't really analogous to macro-level weather factors, emerging from the local cells of temperature-pressure-humidity-direction. Rather, there are indefinitely many other research questions that can be posed about the social world - style and fashion, trends of social media, forms of etiquette, sources of power, and on and on.įor that matter, these don't look much like a macro-set of factors that are generated in some straightforward way by the simple actions of individual persons. But none of this looks like anything like a definition of the whole of the social realm. Population size or density? Economic product? Inter-group conflict? Public opinion and values? Political systems? Racial and ethnic identities? All of these factors are of interest to the social sciences, to be sure. Weather is a closed system, if a complex one.ĭeciding what factors are important and amenable to scientific study in the social world is not so easy. And we can pick out the aspects of physics that seem to be causally relevant to the atmospheric dynamics that give rise to variations in these variables. ![]() How does a field of phenomena come into focus as a subject of scientific study? When we want to know about weather, we can identify a relatively small number of variables that represent the whole of the topic - temperature, air pressure, wind velocity, rainfall.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |